Objective-C? ... By: luisdanielmesa. on 03 Apr 10, 06:54:23 Objective-C? interfacing has been deprecated
And that stops anyone?
want watch - Ruby & ... By: prioritty3. on 27 Mar 10, 15:11:19 want watch - Ruby & the? Rockits in HD and all eps, seasons? then go:
TVFLAP . COM
Just stop? being ... By: nickrohn93. on 09 Jan 10, 08:19:05 Just stop? being one?
I have an idea: ... By: leporidus. on 31 Dec 09, 11:22:18 I have an idea: self-discovery is the first step for self-improvement. Just stop being? one, nickrohn93.
@leporidus I have ... By: nickrohn93. on 31 Dec 09, 10:53:30 @leporidus I have no? idea, lol?
To whom was this ... By: leporidus. on 30 Dec 09, 14:11:42 To whom was this directed,? nickrohn93?
Amen on that. In ... By: narutofan9999. on 08 Dec 09, 17:31:31 Amen on that. In fact, having to teach students to correctly use their computer (IDE, compiler, intepreter) first before even getting the chance to explain the basics of OO-Programming is really a hassle. Really, sometimes manual memory management can be helpful, but in most cases? it just creates hardly readible code.
I can't figure out ... By: bluesrunthegame. on 28 Aug 09, 22:45:13 I can't figure out why your comment was rated down; it is not inflammatory and it expresses well formed, easily defensible opinions? about current coding practiced.
"Java's for people ... By: aaronpiano. on 20 May 09, 07:55:47 "Java's for people afraid of hardware."
Totally, but it's a good thing to? be afraid of hardware. The Application Programmer should not have to think about hardware; that's what abstraction is.
I'm not saying Java is the greatest language (it's not, it's a training-wheels language), I'm just saying it's GOOD for languages to be moving away from hardware.
e.g: The majority of security flaws we see on the internet are due to the antiquated but still dominant practice of manual memory management.
JRuby? is probably ... By: Christriker. on 06 Apr 09, 09:28:58 JRuby? is probably the most fucked up crap I've ever worked with ...
i just agree with ... By: kardanstefan. on 22 Feb 09, 14:33:23 i just agree with you..
vm is a support create by java..
and java did revoluction in mode of program.
how? can jruby do a compair
blyattttttttttt
I was puzzled ... By: Gudmundius. on 07 Feb 09, 14:34:31 I was puzzled aswell, but? have no doubt Ola is aware.
one word? FUCK TARD. By: nickrohn93. on 01 Feb 09, 07:45:45 one word? FUCK TARD.
Almost a decade? ... By: natlang1. on 12 May 08, 07:20:42 Almost a decade? Lisp is older than your dad. Every dynamically typed, garbage collected, object oriented language that supports higher order functions is arguably "based on" Lisp.? That doesn't imply that we should never produce new languages with those features. It's all about the syntax.
Actually, no.? ... By: SolonBob. on 09 Mar 08, 10:00:56 Actually, no.? Ruby has been around for 10 years now. While clearly Ruby has lifted many idioms from Perl directly, but OO, it is more than based on Smalltalk.
As far as Ola Bini, I think you think mistake modesty for lack of experience. Ola is making a presentation since he wrote a book on JRuby. You haven't.
Dear Anonymous ... By: kpriisholm. on 07 Mar 08, 15:11:50 Dear Anonymous Coward.
No matter if you agree with Ola or not, he is very experienced in a vast variety of languages, and your post taken into account, my guess is, he's a lot brighter that you'd ever dream of becoming, regardless of your level of education.
Not going into a discussion here about pros and cons of Ruby, Python or JavaScript - all are great languages, but just in case you don't know, Ruby has been around since 1995, so cut? the BS about 'almost a decade'.
All the features ... By: z4hf2c5q6ymgjxk. on 05 Mar 08, 17:41:57 All the features you naively try to pass of as Ruby's features, have been implemented in a variety of other dynamic languages like Python, Perl, JavaScript, etc.? People have been making good use of them for almost a decade now, probably before you wrote your first line of code. Please find someone more experienced to mentor you.
I wonder if it has to do with the fact that you are "not an educated nerd" (self-taught?) or it is just a way to cash-in the Ruby hype.
It depends what you ... By: hurlm. on 04 Mar 08, 22:14:25 It depends what you mean with scale. with C you can create very scalable applications (in terms of performance), but I would not create a database system or anything networking related with it. It does not scale in terms of development? effort.
Ah yes, the ... By: hagus42. on 04 Mar 08, 15:57:49 Ah yes, the portability problem! That's why all the apps I run these days are "universal" binaries that can be run on any architecture with no? development effort. Thank god the portability problem was solved in the 90s.
Java solved a huge ... By: mcdtracy. on 04 Mar 08, 07:21:25 Java solved a huge problem for developers in the 90's. Producing portable apps (Windows, OS X, Linux, Solaris, AIX, HP-UX). Portability with a single binary image was a huge cost savings factor. It not for people that are afraid of hardware... it's for poeple that prefer to? abstract it.
The crack about mediocre programmers can be applied to any language... The quality of the programmer is othogonal to the language used.
And now Ruby can benefit from the same VM, and platform support.
Latest comments made on this video:
By: balkiprasanna1984. on 20 Nov 11, 14:33:22
I? have used JRuby .. Really cool...
By: mcfiredrill. on 26 Jun 11, 05:35:07
Why did he say ActiveRecord? doesn't scale?? :P
By: flowewritharoma. on 15 Jun 11, 11:40:20
greater? good
By: shakesvongreen. on 06 Jan 11, 15:15:13
good?
By: luisdanielmesa. on 03 Apr 10, 06:54:23
Objective-C? interfacing has been deprecated And that stops anyone?
By: prioritty3. on 27 Mar 10, 15:11:19
want watch - Ruby & the? Rockits in HD and all eps, seasons? then go: TVFLAP . COM
By: nickrohn93. on 09 Jan 10, 08:19:05
Just stop? being one?
By: leporidus. on 31 Dec 09, 11:22:18
I have an idea: self-discovery is the first step for self-improvement. Just stop being? one, nickrohn93.
By: nickrohn93. on 31 Dec 09, 10:53:30
@leporidus I have no? idea, lol?
By: leporidus. on 30 Dec 09, 14:11:42
To whom was this directed,? nickrohn93?
By: narutofan9999. on 08 Dec 09, 17:31:31
Amen on that. In fact, having to teach students to correctly use their computer (IDE, compiler, intepreter) first before even getting the chance to explain the basics of OO-Programming is really a hassle. Really, sometimes manual memory management can be helpful, but in most cases? it just creates hardly readible code.
By: bluesrunthegame. on 28 Aug 09, 22:45:13
I can't figure out why your comment was rated down; it is not inflammatory and it expresses well formed, easily defensible opinions? about current coding practiced.
By: codecaine. on 20 Aug 09, 01:56:44
lol?
By: aaronpiano. on 20 May 09, 07:55:47
"Java's for people afraid of hardware." Totally, but it's a good thing to? be afraid of hardware. The Application Programmer should not have to think about hardware; that's what abstraction is. I'm not saying Java is the greatest language (it's not, it's a training-wheels language), I'm just saying it's GOOD for languages to be moving away from hardware. e.g: The majority of security flaws we see on the internet are due to the antiquated but still dominant practice of manual memory management.
By: Christriker. on 06 Apr 09, 09:28:58
JRuby? is probably the most fucked up crap I've ever worked with ...
By: kardanstefan. on 22 Feb 09, 14:33:23
i just agree with you.. vm is a support create by java.. and java did revoluction in mode of program. how? can jruby do a compair blyattttttttttt
By: Gudmundius. on 07 Feb 09, 14:34:31
I was puzzled aswell, but? have no doubt Ola is aware.
By: nickrohn93. on 01 Feb 09, 07:45:45
one word? FUCK TARD.
By: natlang1. on 12 May 08, 07:20:42
Almost a decade? Lisp is older than your dad. Every dynamically typed, garbage collected, object oriented language that supports higher order functions is arguably "based on" Lisp.? That doesn't imply that we should never produce new languages with those features. It's all about the syntax.
By: SolonBob. on 09 Mar 08, 10:00:56
Actually, no.? Ruby has been around for 10 years now. While clearly Ruby has lifted many idioms from Perl directly, but OO, it is more than based on Smalltalk. As far as Ola Bini, I think you think mistake modesty for lack of experience. Ola is making a presentation since he wrote a book on JRuby. You haven't.
By: kpriisholm. on 07 Mar 08, 15:11:50
Dear Anonymous Coward. No matter if you agree with Ola or not, he is very experienced in a vast variety of languages, and your post taken into account, my guess is, he's a lot brighter that you'd ever dream of becoming, regardless of your level of education. Not going into a discussion here about pros and cons of Ruby, Python or JavaScript - all are great languages, but just in case you don't know, Ruby has been around since 1995, so cut? the BS about 'almost a decade'.
By: z4hf2c5q6ymgjxk. on 05 Mar 08, 17:41:57
All the features you naively try to pass of as Ruby's features, have been implemented in a variety of other dynamic languages like Python, Perl, JavaScript, etc.? People have been making good use of them for almost a decade now, probably before you wrote your first line of code. Please find someone more experienced to mentor you. I wonder if it has to do with the fact that you are "not an educated nerd" (self-taught?) or it is just a way to cash-in the Ruby hype.
By: hurlm. on 04 Mar 08, 22:14:25
It depends what you mean with scale. with C you can create very scalable applications (in terms of performance), but I would not create a database system or anything networking related with it. It does not scale in terms of development? effort.
By: hagus42. on 04 Mar 08, 15:57:49
Ah yes, the portability problem! That's why all the apps I run these days are "universal" binaries that can be run on any architecture with no? development effort. Thank god the portability problem was solved in the 90s.
By: mcdtracy. on 04 Mar 08, 07:21:25
Java solved a huge problem for developers in the 90's. Producing portable apps (Windows, OS X, Linux, Solaris, AIX, HP-UX). Portability with a single binary image was a huge cost savings factor. It not for people that are afraid of hardware... it's for poeple that prefer to? abstract it. The crack about mediocre programmers can be applied to any language... The quality of the programmer is othogonal to the language used. And now Ruby can benefit from the same VM, and platform support.