thanks for your ... By: 4joules. on 19 Jan 12, 20:26:16 thanks for your video
?
@jesusisalive2 I ... By: achan1058. on 14 Dec 11, 04:49:38 @jesusisalive2 I don't it would matter at that point. If all parties are colluding, you have much bigger problems? than whether your vote is accurate and/or private.
Interesting would? ... By: incogn1too. on 09 Aug 11, 15:48:52 Interesting would? he still vote for obama :)))
@tricky778 What ... By: michalchik. on 28 May 11, 22:18:14 @tricky778 What makes you think that? Paper ballots with open access to voting area, chain of custody and counting are transparent simple and secure. Numbered voting receipts that show running total counts rather than an individuals vote are simple, transparent and and secure since they allow two individuals? to come together to make sure their counts jibe. Random seizure and testing of machines on voting day is simple, transparent and secure way to detect fraud. There are more.
@blenderpanzi The ... By: tricky778. on 28 May 11, 14:28:07 @blenderpanzi The voter has their own computer - the voter has data on? the ballot that their own device can verify the vote with. the candidates can verify the tally with their own devices, etc.
@michalchik it ... By: tricky778. on 28 May 11, 14:25:35 @michalchik it can't? be all three of transparent, simple AND secure. your demand is irrelevant.
@jesusisalive2 If ... By: tricky778. on 28 May 11, 14:23:52 @jesusisalive2 If all the parties of the election are? trying to rig it then who cares? At that point the vote is irrelevant.
This is an amazing ... By: MichaelJE2. on 16 May 11, 10:07:43 This is an amazing talk, I'm a high school graduate, in my first year at college and I understood it very well. I'm a bit strange though, and have been interested in cryptography for a long time and have heard of a? lot of the things he talks about.
@jiminssy After? ... By: michalchik. on 13 Feb 11, 04:21:23 @jiminssy After? several centuries of simplifying newtons ideas the average adults doesn't understand the laws of motion. It is taught in HS but 90% of the 40% that take the class never think about them after the class is over. Try this. Ask a bunch of people you know, what happens to the passengers of a car when the driver steps on the accelerator. Most will say, the passengers get pushed back into the seats. What the exhaust port on the death star was for, they won't say thrust.
@jiminssy it from ... By: jiminssy. on 12 Feb 11, 17:44:17 @jiminssy it from completely transparent then I think it is better than? other voting paradigms out? there.
@michalchik it from ... By: jiminssy. on 12 Feb 11, 17:43:46 @michalchik it from completely transparent then I think it is better than? other voting paradigms out there.?
@michalchik People ... By: jiminssy. on 12 Feb 11, 17:37:29 @michalchik People are getting educated more and more. What Newton had discovered centuries ago is being taught in high schools. This may seem very complex but there will be efforts to simplify it and teach this to kids in? the future if it ever gets used and withstands the trial of time, like Newton's theories have. I agree with him where he said at the end, if entire process is opened to the public and learning the concepts from the books is the only thing stopping
check a free ... By: Vrdls. on 13 Nov 10, 21:05:32 check a free training on crypto you have never? seen like this? before vrdls(.)com/crypto just? go directly no registration required also check vrdls(.)com/security
check a free ... By: Vrdls. on 13 Nov 10, 21:04:34 check a free training on crypto? you have never seen like this? before vrdls(.)com/crypto just? go directly no registration required also check vrdls(.)com/security
That guy fascinates ... By: Quast. on 09 Nov 10, 21:24:58 That guy fascinates me. In some moments I feel remembered of Jeff Goldblum in "The Fly". ^^?
there seems to be? ... By: jesusisalive2. on 06 Nov 10, 02:18:42 there seems to be? a lot of reliance on the existence of 'mutually distrustful' parties, specifically political parties - republicans, democrats, etc. What if, as many people suspect today, these parties are inherently NOT in disagreement in reality, although they act like the are in disagreement? Does this very likely scenario cause a problem with this system?
Everything this guy ... By: libertarianjury. on 02 Nov 10, 14:56:56 Everything this guy says is highly suspect. He wasn't smart enough to pick Paul over Obama! LOL. We need Sameer Parekh to? give the talk again, and this time, include "none of the above" as an option in the talk.
Chat with Asian ... By: penkohelan. on 10 Oct 10, 14:03:33 Chat with Asian women ? #lushfmlk.info#
@blenderpanzi Did ... By: Strilanc. on 23 Aug 10, 06:41:45 @blenderpanzi Did you watch the whole talk?
The hardware does not have to be trusted, because the protocol it must follow is? verifiable. Malicious hardware is detected by its verification-failing outputs, without any direct inspection required. You can even have someone you trust write a verifier if you don't trust the existing ones, since verification can be done by anyone.
Electronic voting can be more secure than paper ballots, by a lot.
It looks cool, but ... By: michalchik. on 21 Apr 10, 07:25:50 It looks cool, but I think it? misses one essential feature of a voting system. People won't trust it because it is too complex and people won't aprrecaite when it breaks down. Do you think people will take to the streets demanding justice, if they here the mix master shadow check-sums are off? Will reporters even know to report that? It needs to be transparent simple and secure.
It's much harder to ... By: blenderpanzi. on 02 Mar 10, 13:23:28 It's much harder to manipulate a paper based election. You have to compromise a lot people at a lot of voting sites (is that the correct engl. term?). If you find a way to manipulate the software (in a way that it changes to the not compromised version after the election ended) you can manipulate a whole election with a single point of failure. So instead of O(n*m) (n=voting sites, m=people there) the costs of your manipulation is O(1).?
Even if the system ... By: blenderpanzi. on 02 Mar 10, 13:16:58 Even if the system is open source,? even if the cryptography is sound, how can a non-computer expert verify it works correctly on election day? How can a computer expert know that the right unmodified code is running on the voting computer at election day?
Latest comments made on this video:
By: 4joules. on 19 Jan 12, 20:26:16
thanks for your video ?
By: achan1058. on 14 Dec 11, 04:49:38
@jesusisalive2 I don't it would matter at that point. If all parties are colluding, you have much bigger problems? than whether your vote is accurate and/or private.
By: incogn1too. on 09 Aug 11, 15:48:52
Interesting would? he still vote for obama :)))
By: michalchik. on 28 May 11, 22:18:14
@tricky778 What makes you think that? Paper ballots with open access to voting area, chain of custody and counting are transparent simple and secure. Numbered voting receipts that show running total counts rather than an individuals vote are simple, transparent and and secure since they allow two individuals? to come together to make sure their counts jibe. Random seizure and testing of machines on voting day is simple, transparent and secure way to detect fraud. There are more.
By: tricky778. on 28 May 11, 14:28:07
@blenderpanzi The voter has their own computer - the voter has data on? the ballot that their own device can verify the vote with. the candidates can verify the tally with their own devices, etc.
By: tricky778. on 28 May 11, 14:25:35
@michalchik it can't? be all three of transparent, simple AND secure. your demand is irrelevant.
By: tricky778. on 28 May 11, 14:23:52
@jesusisalive2 If all the parties of the election are? trying to rig it then who cares? At that point the vote is irrelevant.
By: MichaelJE2. on 16 May 11, 10:07:43
This is an amazing talk, I'm a high school graduate, in my first year at college and I understood it very well. I'm a bit strange though, and have been interested in cryptography for a long time and have heard of a? lot of the things he talks about.
By: michalchik. on 13 Feb 11, 04:21:23
@jiminssy After? several centuries of simplifying newtons ideas the average adults doesn't understand the laws of motion. It is taught in HS but 90% of the 40% that take the class never think about them after the class is over. Try this. Ask a bunch of people you know, what happens to the passengers of a car when the driver steps on the accelerator. Most will say, the passengers get pushed back into the seats. What the exhaust port on the death star was for, they won't say thrust.
By: jiminssy. on 12 Feb 11, 17:44:17
@jiminssy it from completely transparent then I think it is better than? other voting paradigms out? there.
By: jiminssy. on 12 Feb 11, 17:43:46
@michalchik it from completely transparent then I think it is better than? other voting paradigms out there.?
By: jiminssy. on 12 Feb 11, 17:37:29
@michalchik People are getting educated more and more. What Newton had discovered centuries ago is being taught in high schools. This may seem very complex but there will be efforts to simplify it and teach this to kids in? the future if it ever gets used and withstands the trial of time, like Newton's theories have. I agree with him where he said at the end, if entire process is opened to the public and learning the concepts from the books is the only thing stopping
By: Vrdls. on 13 Nov 10, 21:05:32
check a free training on crypto you have never? seen like this? before vrdls(.)com/crypto just? go directly no registration required also check vrdls(.)com/security
By: Vrdls. on 13 Nov 10, 21:04:34
check a free training on crypto? you have never seen like this? before vrdls(.)com/crypto just? go directly no registration required also check vrdls(.)com/security
By: Quast. on 09 Nov 10, 21:24:58
That guy fascinates me. In some moments I feel remembered of Jeff Goldblum in "The Fly". ^^?
By: jesusisalive2. on 06 Nov 10, 02:18:42
there seems to be? a lot of reliance on the existence of 'mutually distrustful' parties, specifically political parties - republicans, democrats, etc. What if, as many people suspect today, these parties are inherently NOT in disagreement in reality, although they act like the are in disagreement? Does this very likely scenario cause a problem with this system?
By: libertarianjury. on 02 Nov 10, 14:56:56
Everything this guy says is highly suspect. He wasn't smart enough to pick Paul over Obama! LOL. We need Sameer Parekh to? give the talk again, and this time, include "none of the above" as an option in the talk.
By: penkohelan. on 10 Oct 10, 14:03:33
Chat with Asian women ? #lushfmlk.info#
By: Strilanc. on 23 Aug 10, 06:41:45
@blenderpanzi Did you watch the whole talk? The hardware does not have to be trusted, because the protocol it must follow is? verifiable. Malicious hardware is detected by its verification-failing outputs, without any direct inspection required. You can even have someone you trust write a verifier if you don't trust the existing ones, since verification can be done by anyone. Electronic voting can be more secure than paper ballots, by a lot.
By: michalchik. on 21 Apr 10, 07:25:50
It looks cool, but I think it? misses one essential feature of a voting system. People won't trust it because it is too complex and people won't aprrecaite when it breaks down. Do you think people will take to the streets demanding justice, if they here the mix master shadow check-sums are off? Will reporters even know to report that? It needs to be transparent simple and secure.
By: blenderpanzi. on 02 Mar 10, 13:23:28
It's much harder to manipulate a paper based election. You have to compromise a lot people at a lot of voting sites (is that the correct engl. term?). If you find a way to manipulate the software (in a way that it changes to the not compromised version after the election ended) you can manipulate a whole election with a single point of failure. So instead of O(n*m) (n=voting sites, m=people there) the costs of your manipulation is O(1).?
By: blenderpanzi. on 02 Mar 10, 13:16:58
Even if the system is open source,? even if the cryptography is sound, how can a non-computer expert verify it works correctly on election day? How can a computer expert know that the right unmodified code is running on the voting computer at election day?